Follow us via RSS
- @chandrikasahai - What does funding to change structural injustice actually look like? @PSJPNetwork #AGA_2016 ow.ly/wwr4300yX1y 7 hours ago
- #AGA_2016 #divestinvest Quick straw poll - most in the room already have had the discussion at board level about divestment. 8 hours ago
- #AGA_2016 #divestinvest "Need to tackle the divide at the highest level of the organisation where their roles will combine both concerns" 8 hours ago
- #AGA_2016 #divestinvest "How do we break down the 'iron curtain' between the board and the investing committee?" 8 hours ago
- #AGA_2016 #divestinvest "Our grantees aren't interested in how the money was raised" Do your grantees feel the same? How do you know? 8 hours ago
Monthly Archives: May 2010
I fully expect Foundation Week to be positive and interesting. But in the spirit of the event, which is advertised as a ‘series of open debates’, I want to offer a bit of a reaction I had to a particular assertion in the event materials. While I support the idea that European philanthropy is significant and perhaps too hidden, I am not certain that the main reason it remains off the public radar is due to European foundations being focused on their work rather than their public profiles. And more importantly, I am not a strong supporter of the idea that a higher profile for European foundations would by itself make a meaningful difference to the broader goals of the foundations.
I believe that if the work of European foundations is not on the radar of the public, it is in part due to the fact that the outcomes of philanthropy rarely occur simply because of the work of foundations, even in Europe where foundations tend to be diverse — operating as well as grantmaking. Contributions are required from a chain of actors, including NGOs and volunteers who deliver on what foundations and others can only start. Although money is certainly a key requirement, it alone does not make social change happen. The civil society organizations and local communities that the philanthropists support are directly involved in contributing their ideas based on real, grounded experience. They often bring deep understanding and insight as well as the trust required to bring sophisticated and nuanced relationships and key individuals together. Local governmental institutions, umbrella organizations and volunteers all contribute expertise, support and time. And the individuals who receive services or benefit from services can increasingly, through the ‘magic’ of technology, offer their voices to improve impact.
So it strikes me that raising the profile of any one contributor in the chain can only get us so far. We have to strengthen the overall chain of contribution to get to the best results. I hope that the debates at Foundation Week raise not only the profile of foundations Europe, but of also raise awareness of the eco-system within which foundations operate.
More than the cobblestones, alleys and chocolates, for me the grandeur and splendour of the magnificent buildings in the centre of Brussels is overwhelming. Palace after Palace, maison after maison, large ornate and often plated in gold, these marvellous buildings speak of a vast and rich European history. Today is a quiet day for me – just getting over the jet lag. It is cold and grey – just like a winter’s day in Melbourne – but the conference registration has opened and there is the buzz of seeing old friends – and those you know through emails!
Tonight, Banca del Monte de Lucca Foundation is hosting a Puccini opera which should be wonderful!
At the start of the week we asked you to vote for the session you would most like to see covered, by us, at Foundation Week. The votes have all been counted and most popular session proved to be:
Impact measurement, evaluation, benchmarking, non-profit analysis – What works?
As promised we will now be covering the session, which takes place on Thursday morning with the our findings being published later that day.
Thanks for voting and we look forward to seeing your comments.