Not just the links but the chain

Rebecca Masisak

Rebecca Masisak

I fully expect Foundation Week to be positive and interesting. But in the spirit of the event, which is advertised as a ‘series of open debates’, I want to offer a bit of a reaction I had to a particular assertion in the event materials.  While I support the idea that European philanthropy is significant and perhaps too hidden, I am not certain that the main reason it remains off the public radar is due to European foundations being focused on their work rather than their public profiles. And more importantly, I am not a strong supporter of the idea that a higher profile for European foundations would by itself make a meaningful difference to the broader goals of the foundations.

I believe that if the work of European foundations is not on the radar of the public, it is in part due to the fact that the outcomes of philanthropy rarely occur simply because of the work of foundations, even in Europe where foundations tend to be diverse — operating as well as grantmaking.  Contributions are required from a chain of actors, including NGOs and volunteers who deliver on what foundations and others can only start. Although money is certainly a key requirement, it alone does not make social change happen.  The civil society organizations and local communities that the philanthropists support are directly involved in contributing their ideas based on real, grounded experience.  They often bring deep understanding and insight as well as the trust required to bring sophisticated and nuanced relationships and key individuals together.  Local governmental institutions, umbrella organizations and volunteers all contribute expertise, support and time. And the individuals who receive services or benefit from services can increasingly, through the ‘magic’ of technology, offer their voices to improve impact.

So it strikes me that raising the profile of any one contributor in the chain can only get us so far.  We have to strengthen the overall chain of contribution to get to the best results. I hope that the debates at Foundation Week raise not only the profile of foundations Europe, but of also raise awareness of the eco-system within which foundations operate.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

About these ads

2 responses to “Not just the links but the chain

  1. Thanks Rebecca. Yes, you are right there are many actors on this stage and philanthropic foundations are but one part of the chain. However; maybe if public awareness is raised, if more people are aware of who the various actors are ( not ONLY foundations but those to whom foundations are quite reliant upon) then maybe that works to generate more interest in becoming one of the actors – a call to action possibly for those who have the means, the motive and the opportunity to give – and make a meaningful difference. Perhaps raising the profile of all the links in the chain is part of the answer; but certainly in my experience foundations are the lesser known link in the chain, and thus to opportunity to engage more actors is not always maximised. We in New Zealand celebrate Volunteer Awareness Week annually – as we should: I see celebrating foundations and other actors to be a valuable part of conscience and opportunity raising!

  2. Pingback: Not just the links but the chain « GuideStar International's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s